The methodology behind the Guardian University Guide 2020

The method concentrates on situation-stage league tables, rating establishments that offer each of the situation areas, in keeping with their relevant facts.

To ensure that all comparisons are as valid as possible, we ask every group which in their college students must remember in each challenge in order that they may most effective be as compared to college students taking similar subjects at other universities.

Nine statistical measures are employed to approximate a university’s overall performance in teaching each issue. Measures relate to both enter – as an instance, expenditure by using the college on its students – and output – as an example, the possibility of a graduate locating a graduate-stage activity.

The measures are knitted collectively to get a Guardian score, against which institutions are ranked. These Guardian rankings have additionally been averaged throughout all topics to generate a group-level desk.
Changes added for 2020

The method employed in the tables has normally remained widely regular seeing that 2008 and after remaining 12 months’ introduction of the brand new continuation measure, there are most effective two small adjustments to this 12 months’ version.

1. Integration of the new continuation degree

The new continuation measure changed into brought to the 2019 version of the manual and mixed records for two cohorts of first yr college students – folks that were first-years in 2014-15 and 2015-16. This year’s guide applies the identical method and rolls the cohorts forwards so that the degree refers back to the first years of 2015-16 and 2016-17.

Now that the degree is mounted, the reporting thresholds that had been an the area for its introduction can be comfortable. In its year of advent, a branch needed to have 77 first- yr college students across the two maximum latest cohorts before a legitimate continuation score may be relied upon. This threshold has been secure to sixty-five and might now be spread throughout 3 years instead of, supplied that there had been at least 35 first years in the most latest years.

In the final 12 months’ version, the continuation degree was brought, where available, after the participation of departments have been decided on the basis of the usual metrics. This allowed for up to 2 metrics to be missing without the branch being excluded from the ratings, with the three NSS metrics together counting as one.

While justified as a means of introducing the new degree, this may potentially have brought about extraordinary situations: a department could have been missing the continuation metric, the 3 NSS measures and the profession possibilities rating – together really worth 50% of the total score – and nevertheless, be ranked. But a department that missed the expenditure item, the tariff and the profession prospects – collectively well worth 35% of the full score – could have been excluded.

Now that the continuation degree is here to live, the system to determine whether or now not to encompass a department in the scores has been smartened up. Instead of counting the number of lacking metrics, the effect of the missing metrics is totaled. A branch lacking metrics which might be really worth greater than forty% of the full score is excluded.

2. The final touch of the transition to the brand new UCAS tariff

The 2016-17 cohort of university entrants has been the first to have in large part finished their level 3 qualifications under the new Ucas gadget of scoring qualifications. For the beyond editions we have simulated this tariff based on the brand new scoring device and displayed the effects, but in calculating the overall rating for every department we’ve got mentioned the real Ucas tariff students entered with, based totally at the winning scoring gadget of the time.

This 12 months we are the use of the new Ucas tariff in all instances – both to calculate general scores and to display to users of the guide.
Other signs

We look now at each of the alternative indicators of performance utilized in those tables.

National Student Survey

For all NSS metrics, we use facts for complete-time first-diploma college students who had been registered on the company.

A. Satisfied with coaching

During the 2018 NSS, very last-12 months first-degree students had been requested the extent to which they agreed with three wonderful statements concerning their experience of teaching of their department (a fourth query was brought however isn’t always getting used on this Guide).

The summary of responses to all three questions can both be expressed as a percentage who “surely agree” or “often agree”, or be expressed as a mean score between 1 and 5 in which 5 relates to students who “honestly agree” and 1 pertains to college students who “genuinely disagree”. The table gives an instance of ways a branch of 30 college students would possibly have its records represented within the tables.