How could we’ve notion about the 12 months of 2019 in 2004? It is a completely tough exercise to undertake now. However, to aid us, we’ve got quite a few “Vision 2020” documents made employing consulting corporations during the preceding decade. A glimpse into the ones will inform us that as a long way as hard infrastructure — consisting of roads, railways, water supply, etc.— the aspirations expressed were often reasonable. Some have now not still been fulfilled yet.
The files have now not expected the giant leaps in productiveness-related problems, including generation and human capital. No one should have a notion of a WhatsApp or an Uber. They couldn’t anticipate the explosion of know-how and information via social media delivered approximately by smartphones’ proliferation and the reasonably-priced Internet.
When the committee that drafted the New Education Policy (NEP) thought about the future, they possibly looked at the problem from a tough infrastructure factor: increasing, consolidating, and enhancing present setups. They were, as an alternative, grounded in reality, then willing to seize the thunder by suggesting the massive-scale utility of technology in partnership with the personal quarter. Swarajya currently posted two blistering reviews of the draft NEP on School Education and Higher Education. It is to be was hoping that the committee is aware of the comments.
Government committee reviews are generally of two sorts. The first kind is thrilling, and honestly visionary, but unimplementable with the current capacity and focus. The second type is consistent, incremental, and implementable. A super example of the former, within the economic area, is the file on “Making Mumbai an International Financial Centre.”
In 2007, the Percy Mistry Committee set the economic debate alight using recommending a series of formidable reforms. In reality, they appear ambitious even now. It becomes infrequently touched by the govt. Even the steady pointers of the Raghuram Rajan Committee (2007) and the expansive one in every Justice B N Srikrishna Committee (Approach Paper, 2013) had been considered with trepidation.
In the New Education Policy case, perhaps Prof. Kasturirangan, in his knowledge from operating with the government systems through the years, thought it prudent to awareness of productiveness reforms, even as prodding slightly to appearance further at eclectic possibilities. It has pretty a few noteworthy factors that need to be preferred.
Firstly, the stellar sections in the whole file are 4.5 and four—6, managing languages, arts, communique, and Indic ideas. A fundamental recasting in our curricular framework is on order vis-a-vis Indian medical achievements, philosophies, accurate records, and, extra importantly, a connection with the children’s personal lived realities. A few interesting experiments conducted in Punjab and Maharashtra on coaching math and science in English and Social Sciences in the mother tongue need to be assessed.
The idea of Special Education Zones (SEZ) is innovative. It goes with the Prime Minister’s thrust on one hundred fifteen “Aspirational Districts.” In truth, those are the areas where you’ll be able to assume low non-public-sector participation, and therefore, they could benefit substantially from huge governmental interventions. The government may also conduct profitable experiments that can be scaled up inside the academic system’s relaxation.
In each school schooling and higher education, the committee has recognized the conflicts of interest among corporations that address law, provision of training, financing, accreditation, and requirements setting. This has been an area of lengthy pending reform. Even the previous government considered the separation of powers by putting in the Higher Education Evaluation and Regulation Authority (HEERA).
It is proposed that faculties be given autonomy by placing syllabi underneath the extensive National Curriculum Framework. This will encourage principals and teachers to innovate. More importantly, it will create hard and fast nice practices that work in Indian conditions. We want now not continually look for tips from Singapore or Scandinavia.
The reputation of the importance of Early Childhood Education is a giant too. The committee has heeded the pleas from many non-income advocates for it for over a decade. The proposed integration of early life care and education (ECCE) with the School Education Department is likewise welcome. A seamless progression into primary schooling is tons wanted.
The proposed career progression for teachers from Early Teacher (without tenure), Early Teacher (with assignment), Proficient Teacher, Expert Teacher, and Master Teacher primarily based on standards set with the aid of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) and the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) is a step in the direction of selling advantage amongst government faculty teachers.